• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: ancp

Current state: Submitted to IESG for Publication

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

(System)

RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR

(System)

RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT

Cindy Morgan

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

(System)

RFC Editor state changed to EDIT

(System)

Announcement was received by RFC Editor

(System)

IANA Action state changed to No IC

Amy Vezza

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

Amy Vezza

IESG has approved the document

Amy Vezza

Closed "Approve" ballot

Amy Vezza

Ballot approval text was generated

Amy Vezza

Ballot writeup was changed

Sean Turner

[Ballot comment]
Thanks for dealing with my discuss.

Sean Turner

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

(System)

Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed

Nabil Bitar

New revision available

Cindy Morgan

State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead

Wesley Eddy

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy

Benoit Claise

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise

Stewart Bryant

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant

Adrian Farrel

[Ballot comment]
Thanks for fixing the Comments from my previous review. Looking at this version I found one thing that you might think about...

In Section 12

Sharing
the same IP address between VoIP and ANCP may have other network
implications on traffic routing.

I can well imagine! But don't you think the I-D should make some more
comments about those "other implications".

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.