• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: appsawg

Current state: Submitted to IESG for Publication

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2013-01-30 00:23 (System)

RFC published

2012-12-13 11:52 (System)

IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor

2012-12-12 12:26 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress

2012-12-12 12:25 (System)

IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors

2012-11-27 11:05 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress

2012-11-26 15:41 (System)

IANA Action state changed to In Progress from On Hold

2012-11-06 06:22 Cindy Morgan

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-11-05 08:50 (System)

IANA Action state changed to On Hold

2012-11-05 08:21 Cindy Morgan

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent

2012-11-05 08:21 Cindy Morgan

IESG has approved the document

2012-11-05 08:21 Cindy Morgan

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-11-05 08:20 Cindy Morgan

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-11-05 07:58 Barry Leiba

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

2012-11-05 07:54 Alexey Melnikov

New revision available

2012-10-30 08:42 Barry Leiba

Switching to Informational at decision of the IESG.

2012-10-30 08:42 Barry Leiba

Intended Status changed to Informational from Best Current Practice

2012-10-30 06:37 Stephen Farrell

[Ballot comment]

This was a discuss.

Some sets of octets can be corrected decoded as either BER or
DER. Could I have xxx/yyy+ber+der in that case or what? I
guess there could be a generic question there about octets that
can be decoded correctly according to multiple entries from
this new suffix registry - is xxx/yyy+zzz+www allowed at all
and where's that stated?

Alexey says that this is probably ok for the expert to handle,
which is fine by me. Might be worth checking the generic
question with the list.

2012-10-30 06:37 Stephen Farrell

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-10-25 09:44 Cindy Morgan

State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation

2012-10-25 08:48 Pete Resnick

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from No Record

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.