• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: dime

Current state: WG Document

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2012-10-26 00:23 (System)

RFC published

2012-07-30 14:15 (System)

IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor

2012-07-26 15:38 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors

2012-07-17 18:56 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress

2012-06-22 20:16 Glen Zorn

New revision available

2012-06-04 14:49 (System)

IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors

2012-05-21 12:18 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress

2012-05-14 17:16 Amy Vezza

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-05-08 01:45 Benoit Claise

Ballot writeup was changed

2012-05-08 01:40 Benoit Claise

Ballot writeup was changed

2012-05-07 09:39 (System)

IANA Action state changed to In Progress

2012-05-07 09:20 Amy Vezza

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent

2012-05-07 09:20 Amy Vezza

IESG has approved the document

2012-05-07 09:20 Amy Vezza

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-05-07 09:20 Amy Vezza

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-05-07 09:19 Amy Vezza

Ballot writeup was changed

2012-05-07 07:32 Benoit Claise

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

2012-05-07 00:34 Glen Zorn

New revision available

2012-05-05 12:49 Pete Resnick

[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing all of my comments. It seems you missed a few things in the conversion from "ABNF" to "CCF":

1.1.3 - You say "command ABNFs" when I think you mean "CCFs". If correct, you should also spell it out the first time you use it: "Command Code Format (CCF)".

1.2 - You should define "CCF".

3.2 - In the comment "avp-name", you say "command ABNFs" when I think you mean "CCFs".

These could all be done in an RFC Editor note if your AD agrees; no need for a new revision.

2012-05-05 12:49 Pete Resnick

Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.