• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: fecframe

Current state: WG Document

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2012-12-22 00:26 (System)

RFC published

2012-10-29 07:13 Amy Vezza

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-10-26 21:04 (System)

IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor

2012-10-26 11:44 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors

2012-10-25 12:46 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress

2012-10-25 11:04 (System)

IANA Action state changed to In Progress

2012-10-25 07:54 Cindy Morgan

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent

2012-10-25 07:54 Cindy Morgan

IESG has approved the document

2012-10-25 07:54 Cindy Morgan

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-10-25 07:54 Cindy Morgan

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-10-25 02:48 Martin Stiemerling

Ballot writeup was changed

2012-10-25 02:48 Martin Stiemerling

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed

2012-10-25 02:45 Martin Stiemerling

IPR stuff is cleared: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe/current/msg01029.html

2012-10-17 02:20 Martin Stiemerling

The draft is on-hold and not send out for publication, as the current situation of the IPR that has been declared to RFC 5170 (cited in this draft) and the potential relationship to this draft draft-ietf-fecframe-ldpc is not clear. See also this email: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe/current/msg01020.html.

The discussion about this has been started with the authors of the draft and also Michael Luby, waiting for the result.

2012-10-11 11:01 Cindy Morgan

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation

2012-10-11 08:44 Pete Resnick

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-10-11 08:44 Stephen Farrell

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-10-11 04:56 Stephen Farrell

[Ballot discuss]

I'm confused that there's no IPR declaration given that RFC
5170 has a bunch, yet is a normative reference that defines the
actual mechanism used here, yet the writeup says "there is no
IPR." How's that possible?

Maybe this is really a DISCUSS-DISCUSS about transitive IPR
declarations, but I'm not sure because of the write-up. If its
considered ok that implemeters of this will have to read and
thus be aware of the IPR in 5170, then I guess I'll clear but
I figure its best to ask.

2012-10-11 04:56 Stephen Farrell

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell

2012-10-11 03:14 Gonzalo Camarillo

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.