• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: grow

Current state: WG Document

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2012-10-25 00:23 (System)

RFC published

2012-08-22 12:07 Cindy Morgan

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-08-21 09:42 (System)

IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack

2012-08-21 08:30 Cindy Morgan

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from None

2012-08-21 08:30 Cindy Morgan

IESG has approved the document

2012-08-21 08:30 Cindy Morgan

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-08-21 08:30 Cindy Morgan

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-08-21 08:30 Cindy Morgan

Ballot writeup was changed

2012-08-17 05:57 Ron Bonica

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

2012-08-16 12:28 Robert Raszuk

New revision available

2012-08-15 12:24 Russ Housley

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-07-31 15:59 Robert Raszuk

New revision available

2012-07-22 14:56 Benoit Claise

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-07-05 08:20 (System)

Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed

2012-07-05 08:20 Jakob Heitz

New revision available

2012-06-21 10:01 Cindy Morgan

State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation

2012-06-21 07:45 Benoit Claise

[Ballot discuss]
I've been hesitating between a COMMENT and DISCUSS for some time on this one.

Since Jakob started to improve the draft (thanks for that), I thought about reading the new temporary version, as opposed to the official document on the IESG telechat: draft-ietf-grow-simple-va-09

Then, reading through this new draft, I see the following two comments:
- "Robert, I do not understand the following paragraph:"
- "Robert, I don't understand the lines prefixed with *. "
Note: I counted 31 lines

So that gets me thinking: being a non native English speaker, I recognize the difficulty to write an IETF text, and, if it was only about improving the English, this would be a COMMENT.
However, I see an issue if one of the experts (i.e. an author) mentions that he doesn't understand what's in the draft!

So this DISCUSS is a placeholder while waiting for the next version (which was btw strongly suggesting by some IESG members in their COMMENTS). I will carefully review the next version.

2012-06-21 07:45 Benoit Claise

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise

2012-06-21 06:48 Wesley Eddy

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy

2012-06-21 05:44 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.