• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: ipfix

Current state: WG Document

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2012-10-03 00:23 (System)

RFC published

2012-08-08 23:49 (System)

IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor

2012-08-08 13:24 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors

2012-08-07 16:20 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress

2012-07-31 14:52 Cindy Morgan

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-07-30 20:42 (System)

IANA Action state changed to In Progress

2012-07-29 14:54 Amy Vezza

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from None

2012-07-29 14:54 Amy Vezza

IESG has approved the document

2012-07-29 14:54 Amy Vezza

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-07-29 14:37 Amy Vezza

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-07-29 14:36 Amy Vezza

Ballot writeup was changed

2012-07-10 07:51 Thomas Dietz

New revision available

2012-07-10 07:21 Ron Bonica

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

2012-07-10 06:54 Adrian Farrel

[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my Discuss and considering my Comments

2012-07-10 06:54 Adrian Farrel

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-07-05 07:37 (System)

Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed

2012-07-05 07:37 Thomas Dietz

New revision available

2012-04-26 10:39 Cindy Morgan

State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation

2012-04-25 20:32 Ralph Droms

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms

2012-04-25 05:51 Adrian Farrel

[Ballot discuss]
I don't think it makes sense to have DEFVAL clauses for read-only
objects. They are really used for object creation and are not
appropriate for describing the default beavior of protocol
implementations.

For example...

psampSampCountBasedAvail
psampSampTimeBasedAvail
psampSampRandOutOfNAvail
psampSampUniProbAvail
psampFiltPropMatchAvail
psampFiltHashAvail

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.