• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: ippm

Current state: WG Document

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2012-12-06 00:24 (System)

RFC published

2012-10-29 07:28 Amy Vezza

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-10-25 11:06 (System)

IANA Action state changed to No IC

2012-10-25 08:08 Cindy Morgan

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent

2012-10-25 08:08 Cindy Morgan

IESG has approved the document

2012-10-25 08:08 Cindy Morgan

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-10-25 08:08 Cindy Morgan

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-10-25 07:24 Wesley Eddy

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

2012-09-27 06:49 Russ Housley

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-09-06 06:48 Adrian Farrel

[Ballot comment]
I am assuming that during this evaluation all metrics, metric
parameters, and methodologies defined in RFC 2679 were found to have
been implemented and to be of use.

Looking forward to seeing the action to advance RFC 2679.

2012-09-06 06:48 Adrian Farrel

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-09-06 06:38 (System)

Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed

2012-09-06 06:38 Al Morton

New revision available

2012-08-30 11:27 Cindy Morgan

State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation

2012-08-30 07:00 Pete Resnick

[Ballot comment]
I share the concerns of the others.

2012-08-30 07:00 Pete Resnick

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick

2012-08-30 02:53 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot comment]
As Barry, and Adrian say this looks like an implementation report. If that is the case it would be useful to modify the title, Abstract and Introduction to reflect that.

NetProbe and Perfas+ need references.

2012-08-30 02:53 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant

2012-08-29 13:45 Robert Sparks

[Ballot comment]
The last paragraph of the introduction points to 2026 instead of 6410. Should it be updated to reflect 6410 the way similar text in 5657 was updated?

Does the first observation in section 6.3.2 ("it was not possible to confirm the estimated serialization time increases in field tests") indicate a need to update what 5657 asks for?

Fun fact: If the text survives, this will be the first RFC to contain the word "overlord".

2012-08-29 13:45 Robert Sparks

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.