• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: trill

Current state: Submitted to IESG for Publication

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2013-05-23 18:47 (System)

RFC Editor state changed to MISSREF

2013-05-23 18:47 (System)

Announcement was received by RFC Editor

2013-05-23 12:30 (System)

IANA Action state changed to On Hold

2013-05-23 11:47 Amy Vezza

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent

2013-05-23 11:47 Amy Vezza

IESG has approved the document

2013-05-23 11:47 Amy Vezza

Closed "Approve" ballot

2013-05-23 11:46 Amy Vezza

Ballot approval text was generated

2013-05-23 08:19 Ted Lemon

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

2013-05-21 05:07 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot comment]
Thank you for making the changes to the Ethernet assignment.

2013-05-21 05:07 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2013-05-20 08:29 Donald Eastlake

IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up

2013-05-20 08:29 Donald Eastlake

IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call

2013-05-17 21:36 Donald Eastlake

IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed

2013-05-17 21:36 Donald Eastlake

New revision available

2013-05-16 10:21 Cindy Morgan

State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation

2013-05-16 04:55 Gonzalo Camarillo

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo

2013-05-16 03:37 Benoit Claise

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise

2013-05-16 01:28 Jari Arkko

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko

2013-05-16 01:00 Martin Stiemerling

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling

2013-05-15 09:45 Spencer Dawkins

[Ballot comment]
I balloted Yes because I like it. The document seems well-written and complete, gives thought to operational aspects and security aspects, and provides good background for readers who might not have been the implementers for TRILL VL, but are now implementing FGL on the next release. I do have some comments, but they're not blocking.

Is this draft about coexistence or migration? I'm seeing both words used in the text. We spent some time talking about this recently ("if you're migrating for decades, you're coexisting").

In this text:

2.2 Base Protocol TRILL Data Labeling

This section provides a brief review of the [RFC6325] TRILL Data
packet VL Labeling and changes the description of the TRILL Header by
moving its end point. This descriptive change does not involve any
change in the bits on the wire or in the behavior of VL TRILL
switches.

I found "this descriptive change" confusing on first read. Perhaps "this change in description" might be clearer.

Thanks to the WG for describing the things that could happen when you send FGL frames to a switch that's not FGL-safe.

In Appendix A, I found a "unicat" - guessing that's a typo.

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.