• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: v6ops

Current state: WG Document

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2012-08-03 00:29 (System)

RFC published

2012-06-26 22:42 (System)

IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor

2012-06-20 16:06 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress

2012-06-14 14:01 (System)

IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors

2012-06-14 12:48 (System)

IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress

2012-06-13 07:53 Amy Vezza

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-06-12 13:13 (System)

IANA Action state changed to In Progress

2012-06-12 07:37 Amy Vezza

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent

2012-06-12 07:37 Amy Vezza

IESG has approved the document

2012-06-12 07:37 Amy Vezza

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-06-12 07:37 Amy Vezza

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-06-12 07:36 Amy Vezza

Ballot writeup was changed

2012-06-12 07:07 Ron Bonica

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

2012-06-12 06:36 Pete Resnick

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-06-09 13:43 Nick Hilliard

New revision available

2012-06-09 08:33 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot comment]
I agree with Pete's DISCUSS on this document.

2012-06-09 08:33 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-06-08 10:15 Pete Resnick

[Ballot discuss]
I am glad the registry has been updated appropriately and that this document will be adding to it directly. As such, I am fine with this being Informational. However, it sounds like there is a move afoot to deprecate 5156 now that the registry has been updated. (Comments by Brian Haberman on the 7-June telechat.) Given that, and the fact that there is no longer any need to update 5156, all mention of 5156 should be removed from this document. It can and should stand alone.

2012-06-08 10:15 Pete Resnick

Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Pete Resnick

2012-05-22 13:59 Ralph Droms

[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my issue with the Security Considerations section.

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.