• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: v6ops

Current state: WG Document

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2013-03-12 03:59 Fred Baker

Changed shepherd to Fred Baker

2012-11-20 06:31 Amy Vezza

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-11-19 15:02 (System)

IANA Action state changed to No IC

2012-11-19 14:45 Amy Vezza

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent

2012-11-19 14:45 Amy Vezza

IESG has approved the document

2012-11-19 14:45 Amy Vezza

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-11-19 14:44 Amy Vezza

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-11-19 14:43 Amy Vezza

Ballot writeup was changed

2012-11-16 09:48 Ron Bonica

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed

2012-11-15 11:27 Cindy Morgan

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation

2012-11-15 09:03 Brian Haberman

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-11-15 09:03 Russ Housley

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-11-15 08:38 Wesley Eddy

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy

2012-11-15 07:40 Adrian Farrel

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel

2012-11-15 07:28 Gonzalo Camarillo

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo

2012-11-14 15:58 Benoit Claise

[Ballot comment]
Minor point. Take it or leave it.
In section 2

Section 2.2 describes an attack method based
on the use of IPv6 fragmentation, possibly in conjunction with the
use of IPv6 Extension Headers. This later vector has been found to
be effective with all existing implementations of the RA-Guard
mechanism.

Question: do you want to insert "stateless" in the last sentence?
RFC 6105 makes the distinction between stateless and statefull

2012-11-14 15:58 Benoit Claise

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise

2012-11-14 14:03 Ralph Droms

[Ballot comment]
In my opinion, this document provides useful descriptions of attacks
on IPv6 RA-Guard and techniques for mitigating those attacks.

Revision -07, to be published as Informational without RFC 2119
language (except for text derived from other RFCs), is appropriately
written to provide guidance to implementors to mitigate the attacks
described in the document.

2012-11-14 14:03 Ralph Droms

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-11-14 09:55 Ron Bonica

Ballot writeup was changed

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.