<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ali-ccamp-lsp-inquiry" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ali-ccamp-lsp-inquiry-00">
   <front>
      <title>Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extension for Label Switched Path (LSP) Inquiry</title>
      <author initials="Z." surname="Ali" fullname="Zafar Ali">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="G." surname="Swallow" fullname="George Swallow">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="C." surname="Filsfils" fullname="Clarence Filsfils">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="O." surname="Gerstel" fullname="Ori Gerstel">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="M." surname="Hartley" fullname="Matt Hartley">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="February" day="18" year="2013" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   RSVP-TE reoptimization procedure for Packet Switch Capable (PSC)
   tunnels and non-PSC tunnels has some differences. This document
   highlights these differences, describes how existing procedures can
   be used for reoptimization of non-PSC tunnels and proposes some
   enhancements for reoptimization of non-PSC tunnels.

   
	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ali-ccamp-lsp-inquiry-00" />
   
</reference>
