<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ash-multi-area-te-compare" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ash-multi-area-te-compare-00">
   <front>
      <title>Comparison of Multi-Area TE Methods
</title>
      <author initials="G." surname="Ash" fullname="Gerald Ash">
         <organization>AT&amp;T</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="February" day="26" year="2002" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>This draft makes comparisons of various multi-area TE methods, which are 
evaluated against specific criteria.  Four basic path selection 
approaches are compared: a) distributed methods, 
b) path-computation-server (PCS) methods (centralized &amp; distributed),
c) interarea-flooding methods, and d) multiple-path-compare methods.  
These approaches include needs to support PCS functionality, query 
functionality, crankback functionality, summary-te-LSA functionality, 
and TE feedback functionality.  The target is to converge on a reduced 
subset of required multi-area TE methods and protocol extensions.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ash-multi-area-te-compare-00" />
   
</reference>
