<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.drake-agent-identity-problem-statement" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-drake-agent-identity-problem-statement-01">
   <front>
      <title>Identity for Autonomous Agents and Robots: Problem Statement, Threat Model, and Terminology</title>
      <author initials="C." surname="Drake" fullname="Christopher Drake">
         <organization>1id.com</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="October" day="26" year="2026" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   Autonomous software agents, and increasingly physical robots, now act
   at machine scale and speed across Internet protocols and throughout
   society, in roles whose decisions and actions can have legal,
   economic, safety, security, and physical consequences, often with
   limited or no human supervision.

   Any credential, authorization, delegation, certification, reputation,
   audit history, insurance policy, regulatory obligation, safety
   decision, liability, or legal process concerning an autonomous entity
   depends on being able to identify that same entity reliably over
   time.

   Conversely, when an autonomous entity or its operator is malicious,
   compromised, or beyond effective human control, the absence of
   durable identity lets it shed history, evade consequences, or
   multiply cheaply into Sybil swarms.

   Many proposed mechanisms bind claims to identifiers, accounts,
   credentials, keys, or names that can be replaced, reassigned,
   transferred, revoked, suspended, or lost.  They may authenticate that
   subject perfectly while still failing to establish a durable identity
   for the entity it represents.

   This document offers precise terminology that distinguishes identity
   from the identifiers, attributes, credentials, authorizations, and
   reputation with which it is commonly conflated, minting the term
   &quot;identity0&quot; so that the strict sense has an unambiguous name.  It
   presents a layered reference model showing where current &quot;agent
   identity&quot; efforts fit and the durable identity layer they commonly
   presuppose but do not provide.

   This document is informational and defines no protocol.  It serves as
   the framing and vocabulary document for a companion series that
   specifies a federated durable-identity architecture, provisioning,
   resolution, application, and governance intended to provide a
   practical path from this problem statement to interoperable
   deployment.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-drake-agent-identity-problem-statement-01" />
   
</reference>
