<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.elkins-v6ops-bpf-pdm-ebpf" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-elkins-v6ops-bpf-pdm-ebpf-00">
   <front>
      <title>Implementation and Performance Evaluation of PDM using eBPF</title>
      <author initials="N." surname="Elkins" fullname="Nalini Elkins">
         <organization>Inside Products</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="C." surname="Sharma" fullname="Chinmaya Sharma">
         <organization>NITK Surathkal</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="A." surname="Umesh" fullname="Amogh Umesh">
         <organization>NITK Surathkal</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="B." surname="V" fullname="Balajinaidu V">
         <organization>NITK Surathkal</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="M. P." surname="Tahiliani" fullname="Mohit P. Tahiliani">
         <organization>NITK Surathkal</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="February" day="20" year="2024" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   RFC8250 describes an optional Destination Option (DO) header embedded
   in each packet to provide sequence numbers and timing information as
   a basis for measurements.  As kernel implementation can be complex
   and time-consuming, this document describes the implementation of the
   Performance and Diagnostic Metrics (PDM) extension header using eBPF
   in the Linux kernel&#x27;s Traffic Control (TC) subsystem.  The document
   also provides a performance analysis of the eBPF implementation in
   comparison to the traditional kernel implementation.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-elkins-v6ops-bpf-pdm-ebpf-00" />
   
</reference>
