<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.elkschul-conflict-problem" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00">
   <front>
      <title>Conflict Resolution within a Working Group: Problem Statement</title>
      <author initials="N." surname="Elkins" fullname="Nalini Elkins">
         <organization>EDCO, Inc.</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="H." surname="Schulzrinne" fullname="Henning Schulzrinne">
         <organization>Columbia University</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="November" day="7" year="2018" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   At the IETF, we currently use a set of methods to communicate a point
   of view, to solicit input, to resolve conflict and attempt to obtain
   consensus within the group.  These methods include: writing an
   Internet Draft, discussion on email lists, discussion at face-to-
   face, interim or virtual meetings, and design teams.  At times, these
   methods fall short.  People become entrenched in their positions.  A
   Working Group may be split 80-20 or 70-30 for a prolonged period.
   This wastes time and energy and may have a lasting impact.  This
   document discusses the benefits and drawbacks of each of the current
   methods of communication focusing solely on their efficacy at
   conflict resolution.   A companion document will propose some
   solutions including alternative methods of conflict resolution.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00" />
   
</reference>
