<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark-01">
   <front>
      <title>Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method in Segment Routing</title>
      <author initials="G." surname="Fioccola" fullname="Giuseppe Fioccola">
         <organization>Telecom Italia</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="G." surname="Van de Velde" fullname="Gunter Van de Velde">
         <organization>Nokia</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="M." surname="Cociglio" fullname="Mauro Cociglio">
         <organization>Telecom Italia</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="P." surname="Muley" fullname="Praveen Muley">
         <organization>Nokia</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="October" day="26" year="2017" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   [RFC6294] makes a survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow
   Label.  The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet
   header, but this field is, according to [RFC6294], not used in
   practice.  This document describes how the alternate marking method
   can be used as the passive performance measurement method in a IPv6
   domain.


	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark-01" />
   
</reference>
