<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-12">
   <front>
      <title>Issues and Recommendations with Multiple Stateful DHCPv6 Options</title>
      <author initials="O." surname="Trøan" fullname="Ole Trøan">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="B." surname="Volz" fullname="Bernie Volz">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="M." surname="Siodelski" fullname="Marcin Siodelski">
         <organization>ISC</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="March" day="21" year="2015" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) specification defined two stateful options, IA_NA and IA_TA, but did not anticipate the development of additional stateful options.  DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation added the IA_PD option, which is stateful.  Applications that use IA_NA and IA_PD together have revealed issues that need to be addressed.  This document updates RFCs 3315 and 3633 to address these issues.
	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-12" />
   
</reference>
