<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-msec-ipsec-composite-group" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-composite-group-01">
   <front>
      <title>Multicast IP Security Composite Cryptographic Groups</title>
      <author initials="G." surname="Gross" fullname="George Gross">
         <organization>IdentAware</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="H." surname="Cruickshank" fullname="Haitham Cruickshank">
         <organization>CCSR, U. of Surrey</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="February" day="7" year="2007" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   The Multicast IP Security extension architecture [Weis] implicitly 
   assumes a basic group endpoint population that shares homogeneous 
   cryptographic capabilities and security policies. In practice, large-
   scale cryptographic groups may contain a heterogeneous endpoint 
   population that can not be accommodated by that basic multicast IPsec 
   architecture. For example, some endpoints may not have been upgraded 
   to handle the successor algorithm for one that is being retired (e.g. 
   SHA1 transition to SHA-ng). Group deployments that span multiple 
   legal jurisdictions may have a different security policy in each 
   jurisdiction (e.g. key strength). This document defines the 
   &quot;composite cryptographic group&quot; IP security architecture capability. 
   A composite cryptographic group allows multicast IPsec applications 
   to transparently interact with the single logical group that is 
   formed by the union of one or more basic cryptographic groups. 

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-composite-group-01" />
   
</reference>
