<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-roll-useofrplinfo" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-03">
   <front>
      <title>When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6</title>
      <author initials="I." surname="Robles" fullname="Ines Robles">
         </author>
      <author initials="M." surname="Richardson" fullname="Michael Richardson">
         </author>
      <author initials="P." surname="Thubert" fullname="Pascal Thubert">
         </author>
      <date month="April" day="4" year="2016" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   This document looks at different data flows through LLN networks
   where RPL is used to establish routing.  The document enumerates the
   cases where RFC 6553, RFC 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation is
   required.  This analysis provides the basis on which to design
   efficient compression of these headers.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-03" />
   
</reference>
