<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-roll-useofrplinfo" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-15">
   <front>
      <title>When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6</title>
      <author initials="I." surname="Robles" fullname="Ines Robles">
         <organization>Ericsson</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="M." surname="Richardson" fullname="Michael Richardson">
         <organization>SSW</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="P." surname="Thubert" fullname="Pascal Thubert">
         <organization>Cisco</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="June" day="29" year="2017" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   This document looks at different data flows through LLN (Low-Power
   and Lossy Networks) where RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power
   and Lossy Networks) is used to establish routing.  The document
   enumerates the cases where RFC 6553, RFC 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6
   encapsulation is required.  This analysis provides the basis on which
   to design efficient compression of these headers.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-15" />
   
</reference>
