<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-06">
   <front>
      <title>Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks</title>
      <author initials="C." surname="Filsfils" fullname="Clarence Filsfils">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="P." surname="Francois" fullname="Pierre Francois">
         <organization>Institute IMDEA Networks</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="M." surname="Shand" fullname="Mike Shand">
         </author>
      <author initials="B." surname="Decraene" fullname="Bruno Decraene">
         <organization>France Telecom</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="J." surname="Uttaro" fullname="Jim Uttaro">
         <organization>AT&amp;T</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="N." surname="Leymann" fullname="Nicolai Leymann">
         <organization>Deutsche Telekom</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="M." surname="Horneffer" fullname="Martin Horneffer">
         <organization>Deutsche Telekom</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="January" day="18" year="2012" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>In this document, we analyze the applicability of the Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) method of providing IP fast reroute in both the core and access parts of Service Provider networks.  We consider both the link and node failure cases, and provide guidance on the applicability of LFAs to different network topologies, with special emphasis on the access parts of the network.  This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-06" />
   
</reference>
