<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-06">
   <front>
      <title>Operational management of Loop Free Alternates</title>
      <author initials="S." surname="Litkowski" fullname="Stephane Litkowski">
         </author>
      <author initials="B." surname="Decraene" fullname="Bruno Decraene">
         </author>
      <author initials="C." surname="Filsfils" fullname="Clarence Filsfils">
         </author>
      <author initials="S. K." surname="Raza" fullname="Syed Kamran Raza">
         </author>
      <author initials="M." surname="Horneffer" fullname="Martin Horneffer">
         </author>
      <date month="January" day="6" year="2015" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   Loop Free Alternates (LFA), as defined in RFC 5286 is an IP Fast
   ReRoute (IP FRR) mechanism enabling traffic protection for IP traffic
   (and MPLS LDP traffic by extension).  Following first deployment
   experiences, this document provides operational feedback on LFA,
   highlights some limitations, and proposes a set of refinements to
   address those limitations.  It also proposes required management
   specifications.

   This proposal is also applicable to remote LFA solution.


	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-06" />
   
</reference>
