<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-trans-gossip" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-trans-gossip-05">
   <front>
      <title>Gossiping in CT</title>
      <author initials="L." surname="Nordberg" fullname="Linus Nordberg">
         <organization>NORDUnet</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="D. K." surname="Gillmor" fullname="Daniel Kahn Gillmor">
         <organization>ACLU</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="T." surname="Ritter" fullname="Tom Ritter">
         </author>
      <date month="January" day="14" year="2018" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   The logs in Certificate Transparency are untrusted in the sense that
   the users of the system don&#x27;t have to trust that they behave
   correctly since the behavior of a log can be verified to be correct.

   This document tries to solve the problem with logs presenting a
   &quot;split view&quot; of their operations or failing to incorporate a
   submission within MMD.  It describes three gossiping mechanisms for
   Certificate Transparency: SCT Feedback, STH Pollination and Trusted
   Auditor Relationship.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-trans-gossip-05" />
   
</reference>
