<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-v6ops-nap" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-06">
   <front>
      <title>Local Network Protection for IPv6</title>
      <author initials="E." surname="Klein" fullname="Eric Klein">
         <organization>Tel Aviv University</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="G." surname="Van de Velde" fullname="Gunter Van de Velde">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="R." surname="Droms" fullname="Ralph Droms">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="T. L." surname="Hain" fullname="Tony L. Hain">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="B. E." surname="Carpenter" fullname="Brian E. Carpenter">
         <organization>IBM</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="January" day="11" year="2007" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>Although there are many perceived benefits to Network Address Translation (NAT), its primary benefit of &quot;amplifying&quot; available address space is not needed in IPv6.  In addition to NAT&#x27;s many serious disadvantages, there is a perception that other benefits exist, such as a variety of management and security attributes that could be useful for an Internet Protocol site.  IPv6 was designed with the intention of making NAT unnecessary, and this document shows how Local Network Protection (LNP) using IPv6 can provide the same or more benefits without the need for address translation.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.
	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-06" />
   
</reference>
