<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.janz-nmrg-inter-agent-conflict-resolution" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-janz-nmrg-inter-agent-conflict-resolution-00">
   <front>
      <title>Sources of Inter-Agent Conflicts and Approaches to Conflict Resolution in Network Management</title>
      <author initials="C." surname="Janz" fullname="Christopher Janz">
         <organization>Huawei</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="F." surname="Camacho" fullname="Fernando Camacho">
         <organization>Huawei</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="L." surname="Lovén" fullname="Lauri Lovén">
         <organization>University of Oulu</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="P." surname="Kangru" fullname="Per Kangru">
         <organization>Viavi Solutions</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="June" day="10" year="2026" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   Network management is increasingly carried out by autonomous, AI-
   driven agents that observe and act on the network and service state
   they share.  Where their scopes overlap - the same managed entities,
   resources, or objectives - their independent decisions can prove
   mutually inconsistent, and such inter-agent conflict is, at bottom,
   coordination that has not been put in place; the two are best studied
   together.  This document maps the problem for network management:
   where inter-agent conflict comes from, which families of mechanism
   resolve it, and how those mechanisms are chosen and combined.  It
   then turns that map on a case of current interest in the IETF - the
   AI-based Network Management Agent (NMA) architecture - and offers six
   recommendations for strengthening how that architecture handles
   inter-agent conflict at its Agent-to-Agent interface.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-janz-nmrg-inter-agent-conflict-resolution-00" />
   
</reference>
