<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.lin-bfd-path-consistency-over-sr" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lin-bfd-path-consistency-over-sr-03">
   <front>
      <title>BFD Path Consistency over SR</title>
      <author initials="C." surname="Lin" fullname="Changwang Lin">
         <organization>New H3C Technologies</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="W." surname="Cheng" fullname="Weiqiang Cheng">
         <organization>China Mobile</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="J." surname="Wenying" fullname="Jiang Wenying">
         <organization>China Mobile</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="R." surname="Chen" fullname="Ran Chen">
         <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="July" day="8" year="2024" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) can be used to monitor
   paths between nodes.

   U-BFD defined in [I-D.ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo] can effectively
   reduce the device equipment.

   Seamless BFD (S-BFD) provides a simplified mechanism which is
   suitable for monitoring of paths that are setup dynamically and on a
   large scale network.

   In SR network, BFD can also be used to monitor SR paths. When a
   headend use BFD to monitor the segment list/CPath of SR Policy, the
   forward path of control packet is indicated by segment list, the
   reverse path of response control packet is via the shortest path
   from the reflector back to the initiator (headend) as determined by
   routing. The forward path and reverse path of control packet are
   likely inconsistent going through different intermediate nodes or
   links.

   This document describes a method to keep the forward path and
   reverse path consistent when using S-BFD or U-BFD to detect SR
   Policy

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-lin-bfd-path-consistency-over-sr-03" />
   
</reference>
