<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.linus-trans-gossip-ct" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct-02">
   <front>
      <title>Gossiping in CT</title>
      <author initials="L." surname="Nordberg" fullname="Linus Nordberg">
         <organization>NORDUnet</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="D. K." surname="Gillmor" fullname="Daniel Kahn Gillmor">
         <organization>ACLU</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="T." surname="Ritter" fullname="Tom Ritter">
         </author>
      <date month="July" day="6" year="2015" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   This document describes three gossiping mechanisms for Certificate
   Transparency (CT) [RFC6962]: SCT Feedback, STH Pollination and
   Trusted Auditor Relationship.

   SCT Feedback enables HTTPS clients to share Signed Certificate
   Timestamps (SCTs) (Section 3.2 of [RFC6962]) with CT auditors in a
   privacy-preserving manner by sending SCTs to originating HTTPS
   servers which in turn share them with CT auditors.

   In STH Pollination, HTTPS clients use HTTPS servers as pools sharing
   Signed Tree Heads (STHs) (Section 3.5 of [RFC6962]) with other
   connecting clients in the hope that STHs will find their way to
   auditors and monitors.

   HTTPS clients in a Trusted Auditor Relationship share SCTs and STHs
   with trusted auditors or monitors directly, with expectations of
   privacy sensitive data being handled according to whatever privacy
   policy is agreed on between client and trusted party.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct-02" />
   
</reference>
