<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.palet-v6ops-rfc6177-bis" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-palet-v6ops-rfc6177-bis-02">
   <front>
      <title>IPv6 Address Assignment to End-Sites</title>
      <author initials="J. P." surname="Martinez" fullname="Jordi Palet Martinez">
         <organization>The IPv6 Company</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="R." surname="Roberts" fullname="Rosalea Roberts">
         <organization>Stanford University, UIT</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="October" day="9" year="2018" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   The Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) policies have different views
   regarding the recommendation of the prefix to be assigned to end-
   sites.  However, all them allow up to a /48 without further
   justification and clearly state that the exact choice of how much
   address space should be assigned to end-sites is a decision of each
   operator.

   This document reviews the architectural and operational
   considerations of end-site assignments, and reiterates that
   assignment policy and guidelines belong to the RIR community.  This
   revision is being made to emphasize that IPv6 protocol evolution
   requires an ever-increasing availability of subnets at the end-site,
   so policy should reflect that assignment of a single subnet is never
   recommended.

   This document obsoletes RFC6177 (IPv6 Address Assignment to End
   Sites).

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-palet-v6ops-rfc6177-bis-02" />
   
</reference>
