<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.richardson-rats-geographic-results" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-richardson-rats-geographic-results-03">
   <front>
      <title>Geographic Attestation Results</title>
      <author initials="M." surname="Richardson" fullname="Michael Richardson">
         <organization>Sandelman Software Works</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="September" day="3" year="2026" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   Many workloads have limitations on what geography they are allowed to
   operate in.  This is often due to a regulation that requires that the
   computation occur in a particular jurisdiction.

   There are many mechanisms by which Evidence of location may be
   created and then evaluated by a Verifier.  No matter which mechanism
   is appropriate for a given situation, the result of the Verification
   can be expressed in a similiarly defined EAT Attestation Result.

   This document is about encoding a variety of geographical conclusions
   conclusions in an Attestation Result.  In addition, one mechanism of
   directly creating a geographic result in the form of an Endorsement
   is described in an appendix.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-richardson-rats-geographic-results-03" />
   
</reference>
