<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.skr-bess-evpn-pim-proxy" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-skr-bess-evpn-pim-proxy-02">
   <front>
      <title>PIM Proxy in EVPN Networks</title>
      <author initials="J." surname="Rabadan" fullname="Jorge Rabadan">
         <organization>Nokia</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="J." surname="Kotalwar" fullname="Jayant Kotalwar">
         <organization>Nokia</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="S." surname="Sathappan" fullname="Senthil Sathappan">
         <organization>Nokia</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="Z. J." surname="Zhang" fullname="Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang">
         <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="A." surname="Sajassi" fullname="Ali Sajassi">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="M. P." surname="Mishra" fullname="Mankamana Prasad Mishra">
         <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="October" day="11" year="2023" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>   Ethernet Virtual Private Networks are becoming prevalent in Data
   Centers, Data Center Interconnect (DCI) and Service Provider VPN
   applications.  One of the goals that EVPN pursues is the reduction of
   flooding and the efficiency of CE-based control plane procedures in
   Broadcast Domains.  Examples of this are Proxy ARP/ND and IGMP/MLD
   Proxy.  This document complements the latter, describing the
   procedures required to minimize the flooding of PIM messages in EVPN
   Broadcast Domains, and optimize the IP Multicast delivery between PIM
   routers.

	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-skr-bess-evpn-pim-proxy-02" />
   
</reference>
