<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reference anchor="I-D.tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-01">
   <front>
      <title>Behavior of Collocated HA/LMA</title>
      <author initials="G." surname="Tsirtsis" fullname="George Tsirtsis">
         <organization>Qualcomm</organization>
      </author>
      <author initials="S." surname="Krishnan" fullname="Suresh Krishnan">
         <organization>Ericsson</organization>
      </author>
      <date month="October" day="22" year="2008" />
      <abstract>
	 <t>In discussions about PMIPv6-MIPv6 interactions in NETLMM WG, scenario
C describes the case of collocation of LMA and HA function.  In this
case a PMIP network emulates the &quot;home link&quot; for MNs using MIPv6.
This document argues that even when LMA and HA functions are
Collocated they MUST be treated as logically separate entities.  In
particular this draft argues that PMIP BCEs MUST NOT overwrite MIPv6
BCEs and vice versa.
	 </t>
      </abstract>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-01" />
   
</reference>
