Ballot for charter-ietf-acme
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Just one observation on the ACME name (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acme_Corporation) While funny, this might lead to some confusion if this WG produces an ACME protocol, ACME YANG model, ACME MIB, etc. Indeed, acme is a common name for examples. There is a acme-system YANG model (RFC 6020), which will be found by extracting all YANG models from RFCs. It's probably more of an issue on how we document examples, but I thought I would let you know. Note that I flagged this issue at https://github.com/netmod-wg/rfc6087bis/issues/17, for RFC6087bis.