Ballot for charter-ietf-aipref
Yes
No Objection
No Record
Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Just some minor comments (hence preventing a strong YES): Even if "AI" is a well-known acronym, suggest to use "Artificial Intelligence" at least in the charter text (and possibly in the WG name). `AI model development, deployment, and use`, while I understand the "development" part (suggest using "training" ?), I wonder what is meant here about "deployment, use". `associating those preferences to content in IETF-defined protocols` it took me a while to parse the sentence correctly as I first read it as "content of the IETF-defined protocols". It may be my French bias that cause this misread of mine. `header fields."` suggest removing the extra " `IPTC and PLUS` as I am probably not the only one not aware of these groups/SDO, suggest expanding the acronyms. `Liaisons are intended to inform external bodies ` seems to indicate a one-way communication from IETF to other bodies and not listening to their feedback/requirements