A Semantic Definition Format for Data and Interactions of Things
charter-ietf-asdf-01

• Ready for external review (00-00)
• Approve (00-02)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Erik Kline No Objection

Martin Duke No Objection

Murray Kucherawy No Objection

Robert Wilton (was Block) No Objection

Thanks for the updates.

Roman Danyliw No Objection

** What is "Thing Interaction and Data Modelling"?

** What is currently outstanding to make SDF “IEFT quality”?  I worry that the text currently reads as “start with SDF and make it better”.

** What does "working with experts from OneDM and its contributing organizations" practically mean?  Is this something other than the participants who previously worked on SDF will now continue working on it in the IETF?  Is there some formal liaison activity?

** Per "model harmonization,”  is that trying to streamline the “200 models in the SDF format”?  How wide of scope will this be?  How does one know if one is done “harmonizing”?

** What does the collaboration with the IRTF FDT group entail?

Éric Vyncke No Objection

I suggest to clarify why  an "Implementation Draft" is different than a revised I-D based on experience gained by implementation. It is probably the same concept but it should be clarified.

-éric

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) Yes

(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) Yes

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection

Roman's point about the lack of a gap analysis between "what SDF is now" and "what the final product
should be" is spot-on.

It also seems pretty important to have a clear picture about what the expected relationship between
OneDM and the IETF/this WG is to be.

In a related vein, do we have a sense of who will participate that is not already participating in OneDM?

I suspect that some of the terminology used here will not be familiar to all IETF participants; is the
expectation to just roll the terminology/definitions into the main spec?

It's a bit unclear to me how SDFs relate to TDTs (though I don't expect the answer to need to be
in the charter).

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection