Skip to main content

A Semantic Definition Format for Data and Interactions of Things
charter-ietf-asdf-01-01

Yes

(Barry Leiba)
(Martin Vigoureux)

No Objection

Erik Kline
Murray Kucherawy
(Alissa Cooper)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Martin Duke)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Erik Kline
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2020-09-09 for -00-00) Sent
** What is "Thing Interaction and Data Modelling"?

** What is currently outstanding to make SDF “IEFT quality”?  I worry that the text currently reads as “start with SDF and make it better”.

** What does "working with experts from OneDM and its contributing organizations" practically mean?  Is this something other than the participants who previously worked on SDF will now continue working on it in the IETF?  Is there some formal liaison activity?

** Per "model harmonization,”  is that trying to streamline the “200 models in the SDF format”?  How wide of scope will this be?  How does one know if one is done “harmonizing”?

** What does the collaboration with the IRTF FDT group entail?
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2020-09-09 for -00-00) Sent
I suggest to clarify why  an "Implementation Draft" is different than a revised I-D based on experience gained by implementation. It is probably the same concept but it should be clarified.

-éric
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-00) Not sent

                            
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-01) Not sent

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-01) Not sent

                            
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2020-09-09 for -00-01) Sent
Roman's point about the lack of a gap analysis between "what SDF is now" and "what the final product
should be" is spot-on.

It also seems pretty important to have a clear picture about what the expected relationship between
OneDM and the IETF/this WG is to be.

In a related vein, do we have a sense of who will participate that is not already participating in OneDM?

I suspect that some of the terminology used here will not be familiar to all IETF participants; is the
expectation to just roll the terminology/definitions into the main spec?

It's a bit unclear to me how SDFs relate to TDTs (though I don't expect the answer to need to be
in the charter).
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Not sent

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Not sent

                            
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Not sent

                            
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
(was Block) No Objection
No Objection (2020-09-21 for -00-02) Sent for earlier
Thanks for the updates.