Skip to main content

Benchmarking Methodology
charter-ietf-bmwg-08

Yes


No Objection

(Alissa Cooper)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Ted Lemon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2014-05-24 for -06-00)
Updated milestones will be forthcoming on this charter.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Block) No Objection

No Objection (2014-05-29 for -06-01)
Thanks for addressing my concerns

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-05-28 for -06-00)
I support Adrian's block.

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-05-26 for -06-00)
I realize that this phrasing is unchanged from the previous charter, but I'd like to see us change it:

   In addition to its current work items, the BMWG is explicitly
   tasked to develop benchmarks and methodologies for the
   following technologies:

The charter is what *defines* the "current work items", so that wording is circular, and leads me to wonder what it's talking about -- what are those current work items.

What I *think* it's trying to say is "in addition to the work described above", yes?  If so, can we change it to say that?  If not, please educate me on what it means.

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-05-27 for -06-00)
- I see the in charter:

    The BMWG will communicate with the operations community through
    organizations such as NANOG, RIPE, and APRICOT.

This sentence was added by Ron Bonica in the previous charter. However, this hasn't happened.
It's stil a good idea.

NEW:
    Ideally, BMWG should communicate with the operations community through
    organizations such as NANOG, RIPE, and APRICOT.

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)

                            

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)

                            

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06-00)