Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions
charter-ietf-cbor-03

• Ready for external review (00-01)
• Approve (00-03)
• Ready for external review (01-01)
• Approve (01-05)
• Ready for external review (02-00)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Alvaro Retana No Objection

It would be nice to see milestones for the remaining work.

Erik Kline No Objection

Martin Duke No Objection

Murray Kucherawy No Objection

The fourth paragraph contains a copy-pasta: "... part of a a second ..."

Robert Wilton No Objection

The paragraph "The CBOR working group will update RFC 7049 ..." feels like it might now be out of date given that RFC 7049-bis is already in the RFC editor queue.

Roman Danyliw No Objection

+SACM as a CBOR consumer.

Éric Vyncke No Objection

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) Yes

The purpose of this recharter is to change "add to a second edition of the specification" to "progress them either in a standalone document or as part of a a second edition of the specification", giving the working group flexibility in document organization.  (There are also minor editorial changes to the last paragraph of the charter.)  I do not think this needs External Review.

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection

The lists of consumers could be greatly expanded (DOTS, TEEP, SUIT, ...) if desired.

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) No Objection