Skip to main content

Common Control and Measurement Plane
charter-ietf-ccamp-08-01

Yes

John Scudder
Paul Wouters

No Objection

Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Murray Kucherawy
(Alvaro Retana)
(Lars Eggert)
(Martin Duke)

No Record

Deb Cooley
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Mahesh Jethanandani
Orie Steele
Warren Kumari

Summary: Has enough positions to pass.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

John Scudder
Yes
Paul Wouters
Yes
Erik Kline
No Objection
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2022-05-03) Not sent
Please add milestones
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Comment (2022-05-03) Sent
The term "network slicing" was not mentioned in the descriptive part of the charter however it is in the working group scope. To understand the scope better one need to understand the term better. I would suggest to be more descriptive about it so the scope is better understood.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2022-05-02) Sent
I understand that this revised charter is based on the existing -08 and inherits therefore some nits:

- many acronyms are not expanded (they do not need because they are in the RFC editor list but I had to jump to that list to understand), unsure whether OEO, ROADM, ... are really useful and current

- the use of "measurement" is also weird in this case but too late to change I guess ;-)

- s/been approved by another Standards Development Organization/been specified by another Standards Development Organization/ ?

- nit: sometimes it is IS-IS, other times it is ISIS ;-)

- s/The CCAMP WG currently works/The CCAMP WG is tasked to work/ ?

All in all, no objection as the rechartering appears more like a refresh/cleanup of the existing charter. But, this is really a broad scope WG.
Deb Cooley
No Record
Gunter Van de Velde
No Record
Jim Guichard
No Record
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Orie Steele
No Record
Warren Kumari
No Record
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2022-05-05) Sent
No objection to this, but I do agree with Eric that an expansion of some of the acronyms may be useful - purely for people who are looking for working groups they may be interested in joining and partaking it and who don't wanna have to jump through hoops trying to figure out all the acryonyms in the charter :)
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent