CBOR Object Signing and Encryption
charter-ietf-cose-03

• Ready for external review (00-00)
• Approve (00-02)
• Ready for external review (01-00)
• Approve (01-00)
• Ready for external review (02-00)
• Approve (02-01)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) Yes

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) (was Block) Yes

Thanks for addressing my comments. Just preserving a
part of that below as it may be of use to other ADs in
their evaluations.

I was initially skeptical of this work, doubting that
there is really sufficient real interest in CBOR to
justify spending the time on a WG. However, (just about)
enough people argued that they would or are using CBOR to
convince me that there could well be a real constituency
here. And given that, I'd prefer the work be done in the
IETF rather than ad-hoc and possibly by some folks who'd
prioritise constrained-system requirements too much over
security and privacy requirements. So in the end, I'm for
doing this.

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

Thanks for addressing my previous comment.

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) (was Yes) No Objection