Skip to main content

CBOR Object Signing and Encryption
charter-ietf-cose-03

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) (was Block) No Objection

No Objection (for -01-00)

                            

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-10-25 for -01-00)
I am looking forward to the comments being addressed (or an explicit email sent that they wouldn't be addressed).

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-10-24 for -01-00)
I had some mostly editorial comments at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/9eTTcLBTTl4gU9U0jmdCptZuuGQ that do not seem to have been addressed. None of them were show stoppers, so if they were _intentionally_ not addressed, that is fine :-)

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-10-25 for -01-00)
I agree that we should get the edits in before finalizing the approved version of the charter.

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) (was Block) No Objection

No Objection (2018-10-25 for -01-00)
Thanks for the conversation about the mechanics of rechartering a zombie working group on today's telechat!

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-10-25 for -01-00)
I had some non blocking comments on the charter at 

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/RaDwLxCZ4L8V6eI6kfwiIO3e6v8