Domain Boundaries
charter-ietf-dbound-01

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-01 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Stephen Farrell) Yes

Comment (2015-01-22 for -00-01)
No email
send info
It'd be great if this worked out and produced useful stuff.
That (getting started) is IMO more important than having
the best charter text ever, esp. for the external review
stage. I hope we quickly resolve any wording things (even
without reaching perfection) and shoot this out.

Barry Leiba Yes

Comment (2015-01-21 for -00-01)
No email
send info
The Secretariat should please include the Internet Directorate <int-dir@ietf.org> in the external review distribution.  Thanks.

It is my intent to move the "additional background information" section to the working group wiki when the chartering is complete.  It remains here for now, to make it easier for reviewers.

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Richard Barnes) (was Block) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) (was Block) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Comment (2015-01-21 for -00-01)
No email
send info
I agree with the suggestion of removing the additional information section at the end. Add one sentence to the body of the charter about the PSL if you want, but having that whole section in the charter seems unnecessary.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Comment (2015-01-13 for -00-01)
No email
send info
I had one suggestion. This charter is fairly chatty (which is fine), including examples, but after reading it, I wasn't sure whether I'd be able to tell whether ibm.com and ibm.co.uk were related. 

I think the answer is "yes", but the charter might be clearer if it used an example like that.

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

Comment (2015-01-21 for -00-01)
No email
send info
When this charter goes for external review, we should ensure that some DNS expertise gets involved in the review.  That can be accomplished by asking the Internet Directorate for an explicit review.

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

Comment (2015-01-22 for -00-01)
No email
send info
I would like to see the working group start from a narrow scope and recharter if the scope needs widening, as Richard has suggested.

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2015-01-22 for -00-01)
No email
send info
Thanks for already agreeing to reduce the text by removing the additional background and addresses Spencer's concern clearly in the text of the charter for related domains.

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

Comment (2015-01-21 for -00-01)
No email
send info
Like others, I'd really rather see the additional background info removed (and indeed, paragraphs 3 and 5 of the main body could also be removed). But if you insist on external review with it, I will not balk.

(Adrian Farrel) No Record

Comment (2015-01-21 for -00-01)
No email
send info
Well done for moving the additional information out of the main body of the charter text.

How about going one step further and deleting all of the "Additional Background Information"? I know it is always hard to delete text, but this discussion belongs in an I-D not here.