Ballot for charter-ietf-dhc
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
The bit about independent submissions seems out of place in a WG charter. If it's the expectation is that a bunch of options are likely to be defined in the independent stream and guidance will be sought from the WG, that raises a question about why they aren't being published through the WG in the first place. I would also be curious to learn what practicalities are motivating the move to full standard.
s/full standard/Internet Standard I would also like to see milestones before approval.
I wish all charter proposals were this concise.
editorial. OLD: The DHC WG has the following main objectives: 1. Informational documents providing operational NEW: The DHC WG has the following main objectives: 1. Provide nformational documents providing operational +1 on the milestones.
I would also like to see new milestones.