Dispatch
charter-ietf-dispatch-04

Yes

Andy Newton
Charles Eckel
Christopher Inacio
Deb Cooley
Gorry Fairhurst
Mike Bishop

No Objection

Éric Vyncke
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Mahesh Jethanandani
Mohamed Boucadair
Roman Danyliw

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03-01 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Andy Newton
Yes
Charles Eckel
Yes
Christopher Inacio
Yes
Deb Cooley
Yes
Gorry Fairhurst
Yes
Mike Bishop
Yes
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-15 for -03-01) Sent 
Just a few non-blocking comments:

Why is future tense used rather than present tense in statements such as `The WG chairs will maintain a list on the DISPATCH WG Wiki`, i.e., is this a one-shot or a continuous effort ? I would really prefer to use present tense even if these Wiki pages do not exist yet (AFAIK).

About `The chairs are empowered to create operational procedures` how will these procedures be documented / published ?

`The feedback given by the DISPATCH working group may include, but is not limited to, the following` is rather broad, i.e., does not have a real scope, which is unusual for a WG.
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Ketan Talaulikar
No Objection
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Objection
Mohamed Boucadair
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection