Ballot for charter-ietf-dkim
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04-05 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Supporting Lars's block. Shouldn't be there a clear problem statement to actually to work on this WG? We ask the question in the BoF on whether the problem is clear or not/clearly understood by the attendees or not. It seems this does not meets that bar. Or may be I am misunderstanding something.
## Comments ### "A", paragraph 8 ``` Apr 2023 - Post a consensus problem statement draft to the datatracker (may not go to the IESG) ``` See DISCUSS. ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool