DNS PRIVate Exchange
charter-ietf-dprive-02
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Responsible AD changed to Éric Vyncke from Terry Manderson |
2018-05-25
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-dprive-02.txt |
2018-05-25
|
01-01 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved from Internal review |
2018-05-25
|
01-01 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the charter |
2018-05-25
|
01-01 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Ready w/o external review" ballot |
2018-05-25
|
01-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2018-05-24
|
01-01 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot comment] I am still trying to figure out if there are any any interactions between this work and what DOH WG is working on. |
2018-05-24
|
01-01 | Alexey Melnikov | Ballot comment text updated for Alexey Melnikov |
2018-05-24
|
01-01 | Ignas Bagdonas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ignas Bagdonas |
2018-05-24
|
01-01 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux |
2018-05-23
|
01-01 | Eric Rescorla | [Ballot comment] LGTM. I found this milestone a bit opaque. Perhaps a little expansion? "Nov 2018 Unpublished document on requirements for DNS privacy services between … [Ballot comment] LGTM. I found this milestone a bit opaque. Perhaps a little expansion? "Nov 2018 Unpublished document on requirements for DNS privacy services between recursive and authoritative servers (Wiki) " |
2018-05-23
|
01-01 | Eric Rescorla | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Eric Rescorla |
2018-05-23
|
01-01 | Terry Manderson | New version available: charter-ietf-dprive-01-01.txt |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | Added charter milestone "Submit draft on DNS privacy exchanges involving authoritative servers (Exp)", due November 2019 |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | Added charter milestone "Submit draft on DNS privacy performance metrics and actual measurements (Info)", due March 2019 |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | Added charter milestone "Submit draft on operating DNS privacy services for publication (BCP)", due March 2019 |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | Added charter milestone "Unpublished document on requirements for DNS privacy services between recursive and authoritative servers (Wiki)", due November 2018 |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot comment] It took me a couple tries to read "performance data" as what I think is intended, "efficacy in preserving privacy in the face … [Ballot comment] It took me a couple tries to read "performance data" as what I think is intended, "efficacy in preserving privacy in the face of pervasive monitoring attacks", as opposed to the more expected interpretation as "cost in energy/CPU cycles/etc. per bits served". There seems to be a minor internal inconsistency between "some of the results of this working group may be experimental" and the new work item for potential solutions for confidentiality with authoritative servers, marked definitively (?) as Experimental in a parenthetical. I'm weakly inclined to go through External Review for these changes. |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] I'm fine for this going to external review, or directly to approval without an external review. However, if we do the latter it … [Ballot comment] I'm fine for this going to external review, or directly to approval without an external review. However, if we do the latter it would be nice to see milestones prior to approval. |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Adam Roach | [Ballot comment] > development of documents focused on: 1) providing confidentiality > to DNS transactions between Iterative Resolvers and Authoritative > Servers, 2) measuring the … [Ballot comment] > development of documents focused on: 1) providing confidentiality > to DNS transactions between Iterative Resolvers and Authoritative > Servers, 2) measuring the performance of the proposed solutions > against pervasive monitoring, and 3) define operational, policy, and Nit: "defining" |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2018-05-23
|
01-00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2018-05-22
|
01-00 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2018-05-18
|
01-00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] Please note - my ballot position is Yes, but the responsible AD hasn't balloted yet, so please don't charter this work based on … [Ballot comment] Please note - my ballot position is Yes, but the responsible AD hasn't balloted yet, so please don't charter this work based on MY Yes! Beyond that, I'm a Yes with a thought, that doesn't even need to be discussed before this charter is approved, but I'm looking at this deliverable "2) measuring the performance of the proposed solutions against pervasive monitoring" and the corresponding milestone "- Define, collect and publish performance data measuring effectiveness of DPRIVE-published technologies against pervasive monitoring attacks." and thinking that IFF this turns out to be performance data collection and measurement that could benefit from interaction with IPPM, MAPRG, or both, that might be a useful possibility to keep in mind. I don't see any reason to adjust the charter to reflect that possibility, of course. And I'm pretty sure that the more work you do on this, the clearer that will become, so please start doing the work, and if it turns out we should talk, we can talk then :-) |
2018-05-18
|
01-00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2018-05-18
|
01-00 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot comment] Aren't the first two bullet points obsolete by now? If that works is already concluded, I would recommend to remove them. |
2018-05-18
|
01-00 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2018-05-13
|
01-00 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2018-05-11
|
01-00 | Amy Vezza | Telechat date has been changed to 2018-05-24 from 2014-10-16 |
2018-05-10
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | WG action text was changed |
2018-05-10
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | WG review text was changed |
2018-05-10
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | WG review text was changed |
2018-05-10
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | Created "Ready w/o external review" ballot |
2018-05-10
|
01-00 | Terry Manderson | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2018-05-10
|
01-00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved |
2018-05-10
|
01-00 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-dprive-01-00.txt |
2018-01-30
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Responsible AD changed to Terry Manderson from Brian Haberman |
2015-10-14
|
01 | (System) | Notify list changed from warren@kumari.net, tjw.ietf@gmail.com to (None) |
2014-10-17
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-dprive-01.txt |
2014-10-17
|
00-03 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved from IESG review |
2014-10-17
|
00-03 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the charter |
2014-10-17
|
00-03 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2014-10-17
|
00-03 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2014-10-17
|
00-03 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2014-10-16
|
00-03 | Brian Haberman | New version available: charter-ietf-dprive-00-03.txt |
2014-10-16
|
00-02 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2014-10-16
|
00-02 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] Mar 2015 - WG selects one or more primary protocol directions Not sure what "primary" and "directions" are intended to express. |
2014-10-16
|
00-02 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2014-10-16
|
00-02 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
2014-10-16
|
00-02 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2014-10-16
|
00-02 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2014-10-15
|
00-02 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot comment] "end users’ privacy" -- ZOMG, non-ASCII characters! "The Working Group will also develop an evaluation document" -- As with Pete's comment on the … [Ballot comment] "end users’ privacy" -- ZOMG, non-ASCII characters! "The Working Group will also develop an evaluation document" -- As with Pete's comment on the DTN charter, this seems like a very attractive rathole. |
2014-10-15
|
00-02 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2014-10-15
|
00-02 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot comment] Just one possible nit, there are a few ??? showing up toward the end of the charter that probably are not meant to … [Ballot comment] Just one possible nit, there are a few ??? showing up toward the end of the charter that probably are not meant to be there. |
2014-10-15
|
00-02 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2014-10-15
|
00-02 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2014-10-15
|
00-02 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2014-10-15
|
00-02 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2014-10-15
|
00-02 | Brian Haberman | New version available: charter-ietf-dprive-00-02.txt |
2014-10-14
|
00-01 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2014-10-14
|
00-01 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2014-10-14
|
00-01 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2014-10-14
|
00-01 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2014-10-14
|
00-01 | Brian Haberman | Created "Approve" ballot |
2014-10-14
|
00-01 | Brian Haberman | State changed to IESG review from External review |
2014-10-03
|
00-01 | Amy Vezza | Telechat date has been changed to 2014-10-16 from 2014-10-02 |
2014-10-03
|
00-01 | Amy Vezza | State changed to External review from Internal review |
2014-10-03
|
00-01 | Amy Vezza | WG review text was changed |
2014-10-03
|
00-00 | Amy Vezza | WG review text was changed |
2014-10-03
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | Added charter milestone "WG LC on primary protocol directions", due July 2015 |
2014-10-03
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | Added charter milestone "WG selects one or more primary protocol directions", due March 2015 |
2014-10-03
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | Added charter milestone "WG LC on an problem statement document", due December 2014 |
2014-10-03
|
00-01 | Brian Haberman | New version available: charter-ietf-dprive-00-01.txt |
2014-10-02
|
00-00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot comment] - Provide confidentiality to DNS transactions. (for the querier) resielience against pervasive monitoring is maybe not the only consequence. certain kinds of dns … [Ballot comment] - Provide confidentiality to DNS transactions. (for the querier) resielience against pervasive monitoring is maybe not the only consequence. certain kinds of dns based gtm may also be rendered less useful by them. |
2014-10-02
|
00-00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2014-10-02
|
00-00 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
2014-10-02
|
00-00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2014-10-02
|
00-00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] Examples of the sorts of risks that DPRIVE will address can be found in [draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy], and include both sniffing traffic on … [Ballot comment] Examples of the sorts of risks that DPRIVE will address can be found in [draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy], and include both sniffing traffic on the wire and more active attacks, such as MITM attacks. I'm not too sure what kind of "risks" you have in mind here. Risk of doing what?, risk for whom? Do you have in mind the "security threats"? By spending about 1 min on [draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy], I see that "privacy risk" is mentioned |
2014-10-02
|
00-00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot comment] I support this effort and just have a non-blocking wording question. Instead of sniffing, should the term "passive wiretapping" be used instead? I … [Ballot comment] I support this effort and just have a non-blocking wording question. Instead of sniffing, should the term "passive wiretapping" be used instead? I don't care too much either way on the wording as the intent is clear, but RFC4949 says the term sniffing has been deprecated. Examples of the sorts of risks that DPRIVE will address can be found in [draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy], and include both sniffing traffic on the wire and more active attacks, such as MITM attacks. To maybe: Examples of the sorts of risks that DPRIVE will address can be found in [draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy], and include both passive wiretapping and more active attacks, such as MITM attacks. |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot comment] I'm really glad that this work is happening. At the level of nits, "The primary focus of this Working Group will be" could … [Ballot comment] I'm really glad that this work is happening. At the level of nits, "The primary focus of this Working Group will be" could s/will be/is/ |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2014-10-01
|
00-00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2014-09-30
|
00-00 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] Yes, let's do this. I love (but just don't believe) your timing optimism but am fine with that if its a useful fiction. … [Ballot comment] Yes, let's do this. I love (but just don't believe) your timing optimism but am fine with that if its a useful fiction. I forget if this was discussed or if a conclusion was reached: would it save time to mention now that some of the results here might be experimental or not? (I'm fine with any answer btw.) |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot comment] A fine charter, and one I fully support. Just one small point that I question in the text: Some of the … [Ballot comment] A fine charter, and one I fully support. Just one small point that I question in the text: Some of the main design goals (in no particular order) are: ... - Focus on developing deployable solutions. It would seem to me that developing deployable solutions would be an absolute requirement, not one of the "in no particular order" design goals? Of what value is a solution we deem not to be deployable? It would also seem that some of the other design goals are part of how we get to deployable solutions: backward compatibility, minimal configuration effort, and so on. I suggest just removing that bullet. To maintain the "deployable" aim, you could also change "develops mechanisms" in the very first paragraph to "develops deployable mechanisms". |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-10-02 |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | WG action text was changed |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | WG review text was changed |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2014-09-23
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2014-09-16
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | Notification list changed to warren@kumari.net, tjw.ietf@gmail.com |
2014-09-16
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | Responsible AD changed to Brian Haberman |
2014-09-16
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | Initial review time expires 2014-09-23 |
2014-09-16
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | State changed to Informal IESG review from Not currently under review |
2014-09-16
|
00-00 | Brian Haberman | New version available: charter-ietf-dprive-00-00.txt |