Skip to main content

Drone Remote ID Protocol
charter-ietf-drip-01

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2020-02-21
01 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-drip-01.txt
2020-02-21
00-03 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved from External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat)
2020-02-21
00-03 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the charter
2020-02-21
00-03 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2020-02-21
00-03 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2020-02-21
00-03 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-drip-00-03.txt
2020-02-21
00-02 Éric Vyncke Changed charter milestone "Requirements and architecture drafts", set description to "Requirements and architecture drafts adopted by the WG"
2020-02-21
00-02 Éric Vyncke New version available: charter-ietf-drip-00-02.txt
2020-02-20
00-01 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot comment]
Is the initial drafts list really needed in the charter?

Also I agree about that the milestone for March 2020 is optimistic, assuming …
[Ballot comment]
Is the initial drafts list really needed in the charter?

Also I agree about that the milestone for March 2020 is optimistic, assuming this is the date when work is supposed to be finished and not started?

Then the other milestone is really unspecific. Maybe it better to add more milestones later (with AD approval) when it more clear what exactly the work is?
2020-02-20
00-01 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2020-02-20
00-01 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund
2020-02-20
00-01 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2020-02-20
00-01 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2020-02-19
00-01 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot comment]
Two questions about this:

"* Requirements: the WG is expected to provide an informational document that
lists the technical requirements for applying IETF …
[Ballot comment]
Two questions about this:

"* Requirements: the WG is expected to provide an informational document that
lists the technical requirements for applying IETF protocols to the UAS Remote
Identification (UAS RID) - that is the system for identifying UA during flight
by other parties. These requirements will also include those associated to the
UAS Identifier that need to both meet some constraints as well as some specific
properties."

Is UA distinct from UAS?

The last sentence doesn't parse properly for me. What is the subject of "need to"? Is this saying "requirements ... need to ... meet some constraints ... [and meet] some specific properties"? What does that mean?
2020-02-19
00-01 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2020-02-19
00-01 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2020-02-19
00-01 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2020-02-19
00-01 Benjamin Kaduk
[Ballot comment]
Are the proposed milestones for WG adoption of drafts or the WG finishing them?
(March 2020 seems very optimistic for the latter.)

  …
[Ballot comment]
Are the proposed milestones for WG adoption of drafts or the WG finishing them?
(March 2020 seems very optimistic for the latter.)

  DRIP’s goal is to specify how RID can be made available in both Internet and
  local-only connected scenarios, especially in emergency situations. Some UAS

Also to make RID trustworthy?
2020-02-19
00-01 Benjamin Kaduk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk
2020-02-19
00-01 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2020-02-16
00-01 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2020-02-11
00-01 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2020-02-11
00-01 Éric Vyncke New version available: charter-ietf-drip-00-01.txt
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza
The Drone Remote ID Protocol (drip) Proposed Working Group replaces the Trustworthy Multipurpose Remote ID (tmrid) Proposed Working Group. The history of the group, and …
The Drone Remote ID Protocol (drip) Proposed Working Group replaces the Trustworthy Multipurpose Remote ID (tmrid) Proposed Working Group. The history of the group, and initial chartering IESG Review history can be found at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-tmrid/
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza Placed on agenda for telechat - 2020-02-20
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza WG new work message text was changed
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza WG review text was changed
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza Created "Approve" ballot
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza State changed to External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat) from Draft Charter
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza Added charter milestone "Solution space documents", due March 2021
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza Added charter milestone "Requirements and architecture drafts", due March 2020
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza State changed to Draft Charter from Not currently under review
2020-02-11
00-00 Amy Vezza New version available: charter-ietf-drip-00-00.txt