Skip to main content

EAP Method Update
charter-ietf-emu-06

Yes

Roman Danyliw

No Objection

(Adam Roach)
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Suresh Krishnan)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05-02 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Roman Danyliw
Yes
Adam Roach Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05-02) Not sent

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05-02) Not sent

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05-03) Not sent

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05-02) Not sent

                            
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2019-12-04 for -05-02) Sent
Can we consider just saying "forward secrecy" rather than "perfect forward          
secrecy"?  The "perfect" nature comes with many caveats in general...
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05-02) Not sent

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05-03) Not sent

                            
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05-02) Not sent

                            
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2019-12-05 for -05-02) Sent
I think it would be more use to set milestones for when some work is supposed be finished (send to IESG for publication) rather than when it's supposed to start (WG adoption).
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05-02) Not sent