EAP Method Update
charter-ietf-emu-06

• Ready for external review (04-00)
• Approve (04-00)
• Ready for external review (05-01)
• Approve (05-02)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05-01 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Roman Danyliw Yes

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Éric Vyncke No Objection

Just a couple of cosmetic nits...
- the introduction is really long 
- in the intro, the specific TLS version should be mentioned
- the trailing prime/quote on EAP-AKA' looks weird but if 3GPP uses AKA', then let's keep it
- last sentence should be terminated by a dot.

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection

Can we consider just saying "forward secrecy" rather than "perfect forward
secrecy"?  The "perfect" nature comes with many caveats in general...

What's the relationship between "identifiers for fast re-authentication" and
"creation of long-term credentials for the peer based on initial limited-use credentials"?

There's a lot of stuff set to happen in Nov 2019; is that all staged and
ready to go?

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection