Ballot for charter-ietf-emu
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05-02 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Can we consider just saying "forward secrecy" rather than "perfect forward secrecy"? The "perfect" nature comes with many caveats in general...
I think it would be more use to set milestones for when some work is supposed be finished (send to IESG for publication) rather than when it's supposed to start (WG adoption).