Hypertext Transfer Protocol

The information below is for an older proposed charter
Document Proposed charter Hypertext Transfer Protocol WG (httpbis) Snapshot
Title Hypertext Transfer Protocol
Last updated 2018-10-23
State Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review) Rechartering
WG State Active
IESG Responsible AD Francesca Palombini
Charter Edit AD Alexey Melnikov
Send notices to (None)


This Working Group is charged with maintaining and developing the
"core" specifications for HTTP, and generic extensions to it (i.e.,
those that are not specific to one application).

Its current work items are:

# HTTP/1.1 Revision

After the revision of the core HTTP document set in the RFC723x series, the
Working Group published HTTP/2, which defines an alternative mapping of
HTTP's semantics to TCP, and introduced new capabilities, like Server Push.

Additionally, several ambiguities, interoperability issues and errata have been
identified since their publication.

The Working Group will refine the "core" HTTP document set to:

* Incorporate errata
* Address ambiguities
* Fix editorial problems which have led to misunderstandings of the
specification * Clarify conformance requirements * Remove known ambiguities
where they affect interoperability * Clarify existing methods of extensibility
* Remove or deprecate those features that are not widely implemented and also
unduly affect interoperability * Where necessary, add implementation advice

In doing so, it should consider:
* Implementer experience
* Demonstrated use of HTTP
* Impact on existing implementations and deployments


The Working Group will review the QUIC Working Group's documents regarding
the use of HTTP over the transport protocol they define, providing feedback and
collaborating where necessary.

# Other HTTP-Related Work

The Working Group may define extensions and other documents related to HTTP as
work items, provided that: * They are generic; i.e., not specific to one
application using HTTP. Note that Web browsing by definition is a generic use.
* The Working Group Chairs judge that there is consensus to take on the item
and believe that it will not interfere with the work described above, and * The
Area Director approves the addition and add corresponding milestones.