Update to IANA Considerations
charter-ietf-ianabis-00-05
Yes
Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
No Record
Francesca Palombini
Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Deb Cooley
Yes
Erik Kline
Yes
John Scudder
(was Block)
Yes
Murray Kucherawy
Yes
Orie Steele
Yes
Paul Wouters
Yes
Roman Danyliw
Yes
Warren Kumari
Yes
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment
(2024-11-20)
Sent
Just one minor comment about the last paragraph `By updating BCP 26, the IANABIS Working Group aims...` as it sounds like a marketing sentence for this WG ;-) (a matter of taste)
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Objection
Comment
(2024-10-24 for -00-04)
Sent
Sorry for not bringing this up earlier, but I realized that the IANA Considerations section is used to register YANG modules, and updates to YANG modules that are maintained by IANA. Some of that text of how to do that has gone into rfc8407-bis, which is not completely out of place, but would like some debate around whether that belongs in this charter, and/or whether it should be moved to the BCP.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Comment
(2024-11-21)
Sent
It would be good to understand how the -bis outcome would impact the older documents, will the wg also work on that?
Francesca Palombini
No Record